ADMS - Comment from Agrometeorologist 2019-06-01

Comment from Agrometeorologist

Select year

Select period

Communication report regarding the incidences of drought conditions in Poland

The Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation – State Research Institute, in accordance with an Act of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development has developed the climatic water balance values for all 2477 Polish local districts (gminas) and, based on soil categories, calculated the current risk of agricultural drought.

In the eighth reporting period, i.e. from June 1st to July 31st, 2019, IUNG-PIB stated agricultural drought conditions in Poland.

The average of Climatic Water Balance values, which are the basis for assessing the risk of agricultural drought, was negative and equalled -173 mm. It has decreased by 40 mm in comparison to the previous sixty-day reporting period (May 21st - July 20th).

The largest water deficit in the period from June 1st to July 31st (as in the previous reporting periods) was recorded in Lubuskie Lake District and, additionally, in Wielkopolskie Lake District and Wielkopolska Lowland. The Climatic Water Balance values in this area range from -240 to -279 mm. Very low CWB values were also recorded in the southern part of Silesian Lowland and in Łódź Hills, ranging from -240 mm to -259 mm. In the majority of Poland CWB values are low and range from -160 mm to -239 mm. Only in the eastern part of the South Baltic Sea Region and western part of Masurian Lake District, as well as in the southernmost part of Poland the CWB values are slightly higher and range from -100 mm to -159 mm.

Agricultural drought was stated in all the voivodeships, as follows:

Lubuskie,
Wielkopolskie,
Łódzkie,
Opolskie,
Podlaskie,
Mazowieckie,
Zachodniopomorskie,
Dolnośląskie,
Lubelskie,
Pomorskie,
Kujawsko-pomorskie,
Śląskie,
Świętokrzyskie,
Podkarpackie,
Warmińsko – mazurskie,
Małopolskie.

Agricultural drought was stated in all the monitored crops, as follows:

Spring cereals,
Winter cereals,
Fruit shrubs,
Strawberries,
Legumes,
Maize for grain,
Maize for silage,
Fruit trees,
Ground vegetables,
Tobacco,
Sugar beet,
Potato,
Hops.

Table 1 presents the area affected by agricultural drought according to particular crops in the current sixty-day reporting period.

Table 1. Crops affected by agricultural drought in the period of June 1st – July 31st – the share (%) of gminas at risk of drought occurrence in Poland.

No. Crop Share of local districts (gminas) at risk in Poland [%] Share of arable area at risk of agricultural drought [%] in Poland

1. Maize for grain 2231 90.07

2. Maize for silage 2231 90.07

3. Fruit shrubs 2149 86.76

4. Legumes 2104 84.94

5. Ground vegetables 1866 75.33

6 Tobacco 1834 74.04

7. Spring cereals 1833 74.00

8. Strawberries 1623 65.52

9. Hops 1602 64.68

10. Winter cereals 1601 64.63

11. Potato 1580 63.79

12. Fruit trees 1466 59.18

13. Sugar beet 1067 43.08

Information on the area of arable land affected by drought in the current sixty-day reporting period is presented in table 2.

Table. 2. The share (%) of the area of arable land potentially affected by agricultural drought.

No. Crop Share of arable area at risk of agricultural drought [%] in Poland

1. Fruit shrubs 61.36

2. Maize for grain 57.23

3. Maize for silage 57.23

4. Legumes 56.16

5. Tobacco 48.70

6. Ground vegetables 43.55

7. Spring cereals 42.88

8. Strawberries 35.32

9. Hops 33.94

10. Potato 33.47

11. Winter cereals 32.63

12. Fruit trees 28.00

13. Sugar beet 15.82

In the eighth reporting period, from June 1st to July 31st, 2019, the highest risk of agricultural drought occurred for maize for grain. Agricultural drought in this crop occurred in 2231 local districts (gminas), which constitute 90.07% of all the local districts in Poland. In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 539. Agricultural drought occurred in all the voivodeships, in the area of 57.23% of arable land. Table 3 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in maize for grain in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 3. Agricultural drought in maize for grain

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 95.19

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 95.31

3. mazowieckie 314 314 100.00 74.46

4. opolskie 71 71 100.00 53.44

5. podlaskie 118 118 100.00 45.38

6. świętokrzyskie 102 102 100.00 49.17

7. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 98.62

8. zachodniopomorskie 113 113 100.00 73.48

9. lubelskie 213 212 99.53 55.94

10. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 137 95.14 61.81

11. dolnośląskie 169 153 90.53 40.18

12. śląskie 167 147 88.02 56.48

13. małopolskie 182 154 84.62 11.86

14. podkarpackie 160 132 82.50 23.88

15. pomorskie 123 57 46.34 22.74

16. warmińsko-mazurskie 116 36 31.03 5.31

Agricultural drought affected also maize for silage. It was also recorded in 2231 local districts (gminas) in Poland (90.07% of all local districts in the country), which is 539 more than in the previous reporting period. Agricultural drought occurred in all the voivodeships, in the area of 57.23% of arable land. Table 4 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in maize for silage in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 4. Agricultural drought in maize for silage

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 95.19

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 95.31

3. mazowieckie 314 314 100.00 74.46

4. opolskie 71 71 100.00 53.44

5. podlaskie 118 118 100.00 45.38

6. świętokrzyskie 102 102 100.00 49.17

7. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 98.62

8. zachodniopomorskie 113 113 100.00 73.48

9. lubelskie 213 212 99.53 55.94

10. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 137 95.14 61.81

11. dolnośląskie 169 153 90.53 40.18

12. śląskie 167 147 88.02 56.48

13. małopolskie 182 154 84.62 11.86

14. podkarpackie 160 132 82.50 23.88

15. pomorskie 123 57 46.34 22.74

16. warmińsko-mazurskie 116 36 31.03 5.31

In the current reporting period agricultural drought affected also fruit shrubs. It was recorded in 2149 local districts (gminas) in Poland (86.76% of all local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 522. Agricultural drought in fruit shrubs occurred in all the voivodeships, in the area of 61.36% of arable land. Table 5 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in fruit shrubs in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 5. Agricultural drought in fruit shrubs

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 99.25

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 97.39

3. mazowieckie 314 314 100.00 80.21

4. opolskie 71 71 100.00 68.53

5. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 99.82

6. zachodniopomorskie 113 113 100.00 81.69

7. świętokrzyskie 102 101 99.02 58.10

8. lubelskie 213 210 98.59 64.22

9. podlaskie 118 112 94.92 42.84

10. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 128 88.89 65.26

11. dolnośląskie 169 147 86.98 51.35

12. śląskie 167 138 82.63 62.62

13. podkarpackie 160 127 79.38 24.98

14. małopolskie 182 144 79.12 15.20

15. pomorskie 123 46 37.40 21.95

16. warmińsko-mazurskie 116 13 11.21 0.54

Agricultural drought occurred also in legumes. It was recorded in 2104 local districts (gminas) in Poland (84.94% of all local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 554. Drought occurred in all the voivodeships, in the area of 56.166% of arable land. Table 6 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in legumes in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 6. Agricultural drought in legumes

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 98.61

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 96.31

3. opolskie 71 71 100.00 58.83

4. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 99.60

5. zachodniopomorskie 113 113 100.00 68.78

6. mazowieckie 314 313 99.68 73.49

7. lubelskie 213 209 98.12 56.83

8. świętokrzyskie 102 100 98.04 49.63

9. podlaskie 118 104 88.14 32.20

10. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 125 86.81 59.73

11. dolnośląskie 169 142 84.02 44.01

12. śląskie 167 136 81.44 57.16

13. podkarpackie 160 123 76.88 23.40

14. małopolskie 182 138 75.82 11.79

15. pomorskie 123 41 33.33 18.59

16. warmińsko-mazurskie 116 4 3.45 0.05

Agricultural drought occurred also in ground vegetables. It was recorded in 1866 local districts (gminas) in Poland (75.33% of all local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 613. Drought occurred in 15 voivodeships, in the area of 43.55% of arable land. Table 7 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in ground vegetables in particular voivodeships

Tab. 7. Agricultural drought in ground vegetables

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 93.53

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 83.34

3. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 96.86

4. opolskie 71 70 98.59 41.65

5. zachodniopomorskie 113 109 96.46 42.50

6. lubelskie 213 202 94.84 41.14

7. świętokrzyskie 102 90 88.24 34.35

8. mazowieckie 314 271 86.31 52.20

9. śląskie 167 131 78.44 45.35

10. dolnośląskie 169 130 76.92 32.32

11. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 109 75.69 42.65

12. małopolskie 182 109 59.89 7.74

13. podkarpackie 160 88 55.00 18.36

14. podlaskie 118 49 41.53 13.04

15. pomorskie 123 23 18.70 8.74

In the current reporting period agricultural drought occurred also in tobacco. It was recorded in 1834 local districts (gminas) in Poland (74.04% of all local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 598. Drought occurred in 15 voivodeships, in the area of 48.70% of arable land. Table 8 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in tobacco in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 8. Agricultural drought tobacco

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 98.65

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 94.08

3. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 99.26

4. opolskie 71 69 97.18 58.99

5. lubelskie 213 201 94.37 52.07

6. zachodniopomorskie 113 105 92.92 47.67

7. świętokrzyskie 102 88 86.27 38.23

8. mazowieckie 314 269 85.67 55.88

9. śląskie 167 131 78.44 53.29

10. dolnośląskie 169 130 76.92 43.07

11. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 107 74.31 48.49

12. małopolskie 182 102 56.04 8.88

13. podkarpackie 160 83 51.88 19.78

14. podlaskie 118 43 36.44 12.47

15. pomorskie 123 21 17.07 8.95

In the reporting period from June 1st to July 31st agricultural drought occurred also in spring cereals. It was recorded in 1833 local districts (gminas) in Poland (74% of all the local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 336. Agricultural drought occurred in 15 voivodeships, in the area of 42.88% of arable land. Table 9 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in spring cereals in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 9. Agricultural drought in spring cereals

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 94.15

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 84.55

3. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 97.45

4. opolskie 71 69 97.18 44.98

5. lubelskie 213 201 94.37 39.54

6. zachodniopomorskie 113 105 92.92 37.63

7. świętokrzyskie 102 88 86.27 33.12

8. mazowieckie 314 269 85.67 50.52

9. śląskie 167 131 78.44 45.32

10. dolnośląskie 169 130 76.92 33.20

11. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 107 74.31 41.34

12. małopolskie 182 101 55.49 7.08

13. podkarpackie 160 83 51.88 17.35

14. podlaskie 118 43 36.44 11.35

15. pomorskie 123 21 17.07 7.93

Agricultural drought occurred also in strawberries. It was recorded in 1623 local districts (gminas) in Poland (65.52% of all local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 490. Agricultural drought in strawberries occurred in 15 voivodeships, in the area of 35.32% of arable land. Table 10 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in strawberries in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 10. Agricultural drought in strawberries

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 87.58

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 78.70

3. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 92.55

4. opolskie 71 67 94.37 32.26

5. lubelskie 213 193 90.61 32.02

6. mazowieckie 314 242 77.07 37.61

7. śląskie 167 120 71.86 41.74

8. świętokrzyskie 102 73 71.57 24.06

9. dolnośląskie 169 118 69.82 27.69

10. zachodniopomorskie 113 76 67.26 20.67

11. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 85 59.03 28.79

12. małopolskie 182 70 38.46 4.80

13. podkarpackie 160 61 38.12 12.46

14. podlaskie 118 22 18.64 4.27

15. pomorskie 123 11 8.94 3.18

Agricultural drought affected also hops. It was recorded in 1602 local districts (gminas) in Poland (64.68 % of all local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 830. Drought in hops occurred in 15 voivodeships, in the area of 33,94% of arable land. Table 11 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in hops in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 11. Agricultural drought in hops

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 84.06

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 77.43

3. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 90.35

4. opolskie 71 67 94.37 31.99

5. lubelskie 213 191 89.67 30.96

6. mazowieckie 314 239 76.11 34.92

7. śląskie 167 120 71.86 40.97

8. świętokrzyskie 102 71 69.61 22.59

9. dolnośląskie 169 117 69.23 26.61

10. zachodniopomorskie 113 73 64.60 18.82

11. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 82 56.94 26.87

12. małopolskie 182 68 37.36 4.42

13. podkarpackie 160 58 36.25 11.47

14. podlaskie 118 21 17.80 3.95

15. pomorskie 123 10 8.13 2.57

Agricultural drought occurred also in winter cereals. It was recorded in 1601 local districts (gminas) in Poland (64.63% of all the local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 287. Agricultural drought occurred in 15 voivodeships, in the area of 32.63% of arable land. Table 12 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in winter cereals in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 12. Agricultural drought in winter cereals

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 81.79

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 76.43

3. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 89.02

4. opolskie 71 67 94.37 31.72

5. lubelskie 213 191 89.67 29.37

6. mazowieckie 314 239 76.11 32.01

7. śląskie 167 120 71.86 39.30

8. świętokrzyskie 102 71 69.61 20.97

9. dolnośląskie 169 117 69.23 25.56

10. zachodniopomorskie 113 73 64.60 16.93

11. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 82 56.94 24.81

12. małopolskie 182 67 36.81 4.07

13. podkarpackie 160 58 36.25 10.88

14. podlaskie 118 21 17.80 3.95

15. pomorskie 123 10 8.13 2.09

Agricultural drought occurred in potatoes. It was recorded in 1580 local districts (gminas) in Poland (63.79% of all local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 940. Drought occurred in 15 voivodeships, in the area of 33.47% of arable land. Table 13 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in potatoes in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 13. Agricultural drought in potatoes

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 87.04

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 77.96

3. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 92.15

4. opolskie 71 67 94.37 31.81

5. lubelskie 213 190 89.20 29.85

6. mazowieckie 314 237 75.48 32.74

7. śląskie 167 118 70.66 39.86

8. dolnośląskie 169 116 68.64 26.96

9. świętokrzyskie 102 70 68.63 20.96

10. zachodniopomorskie 113 71 62.83 17.00

11. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 79 54.86 25.21

12. podkarpackie 160 56 35.00 10.64

13. małopolskie 182 60 32.97 3.98

14. podlaskie 118 21 17.80 3.68

15. pomorskie 123 10 8.13 2.06

Agricultural drought was also recorded in fruit trees. It occurred in 1466 local districts (gminas) in Poland (59.18% of all local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 560. Drought occurred in 15 voivodeships, in the area of 28% of arable land. Table 14 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in fruit trees in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 14. Agricultural drought in fruit trees

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. lubuskie 82 82 100.00 77.78

2. łódzkie 177 177 100.00 67.22

3. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 84.41

4. opolskie 71 66 92.96 30.62

5. lubelskie 213 174 81.69 21.56

6. mazowieckie 314 223 71.02 24.44

7. śląskie 167 112 67.07 31.70

8. dolnośląskie 169 111 65.68 22.65

9. świętokrzyskie 102 59 57.84 15.95

10. zachodniopomorskie 113 53 46.90 11.03

11. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 65 45.14 20.85

12. podkarpackie 160 44 27.50 7.01

13. małopolskie 182 50 27.47 2.21

14. podlaskie 118 17 14.41 2.52

15. pomorskie 123 7 5.69 1.37

Agricultural drought occurred in sugar beet as well. It was recorded in 1067 local districts (gminas) in Poland (43.08% of all local districts in the country). In relation to the previous reporting period, the number of gminas affected by drought has increased by 843. Drought occurred in 14 voivodeships, in the area of 15.82% of arable land. Table 15 presents detailed data on drought occurrence in sugar beet in particular voivodeships.

Tab. 15. Agricultural drought in sugar beet

No. Voivodeship Number of local districts Number of local districts at risk Share of local districts at risk [%] Share of the area at risk [%]

1. wielkopolskie 226 226 100.00 56.29

2. lubuskie 82 81 98.78 44.47

3. łódzkie 177 173 97.74 34.73

4. opolskie 71 62 87.32 21.14

5. dolnośląskie 169 88 52.07 15.58

6. śląskie 167 86 51.50 17.69

7. lubelskie 213 107 50.23 11.45

8. mazowieckie 314 126 40.13 9.43

9. świętokrzyskie 102 33 32.35 2.57

10. kujawsko-pomorskie 144 40 27.78 15.10

11. zachodniopomorskie 113 21 18.58 5.54

12. małopolskie 182 14 7.69 0.84

13. podkarpackie 160 8 5.00 1.01

14. pomorskie 123 2 1.63 0.13

June was very warm. The highest temperatures occurred in south-western parts of Poland and ranged from 22 to more than 23°C (exceeding the multiannual norm by 6°C). The lowest temperatures occurred in the northern and southern parts of the country, ranging from 19 to 22°C but still exceeding the multiannual norm by 3-6°C.

The first and second decade of July were cold, but the third one was warmer. In the first decade, the lowest temperatures occurred in the northern part of Poland, ranging from below 14.5 to 16°C. In the south temperatures were higher, between 16-19°C. The highest temperatures were recorded in Carpathian Foothills, i.e. slightly above 19°C. In the second decade of the month, the eastern part of the country was the coldest, with temperatures ranging from 16 to 17°C. The highest temperatures were recorded in the western regions, ranging from 17 to 18°C. The third decade of July was the warmest in the western regions of Poland, with temperatures ranging from 22 to more than 23°C, and the coldest (but still relatively warm) in north-eastern part of the country, from 19 to 20°C.

In June, in the majority of areas precipitation was scarce, in particular in Wielkopolskie Lake District, Wielkopolska Lowland, Kraków-Częstochowa Upland and Sandomierz Basin, where it ranged from 10 to 20 mm and constituted 20-30% of the multiannual norm. Relatively high precipitation was recorded in north-eastern parts of Poland, ranging from 60 to 110 mm, which constituted from 100 to more than 130% of the norm. In the majority of areas precipitation ranged from 20 to 60 mm (30-100% of the norm).

In the first and third decade of July precipitation was highly diversified. In the first decade in the northern part of Poland and in the third decade in the south-eastern regions it ranged from 15 to even more than 50 mm, whilst in the central part of the country it was only between 5-15 mm. In the south of Poland during the first decade and in the north-western regions during the third precipitation was even below 5 mm, whilst in the second decade of the month very scarce precipitation was recorded throughout the country, ranging from 5 to 10 mm. Only in the south-western regions and in the mountains rainfalls were more intense, reaching 10-30 mm.

In the recent sixty-day reporting periods, a particularly severe water deficit was recorded throughout Poland, resulting in considerable water shortage for crops. In many regions water deficit has increased by 20 to 30 mm or even more than 40 mm. In relation to the previous reporting period, as it was 10 days ago, the number of gminas affected by agricultural drought has risen significantly for all the monitored crops, ranging from 287 for winter cereals to 940 in case of potatoes. Agricultural drought has been currently reported for all the monitored crop species or groups in all the voivodeships in Poland.

Executive director

Prof. dr. hab. Wiesław Oleszek

Report prepared by:

Dr hab. Andrzej Doroszewski, prof. nadzw.

Dr hab. Rafał Pudełko

Dr Katarzyna Żyłowska

Dr Jan Jadczyszyn

Mgr Piotr Koza

Mgr Elżbieta Wróblewska

Mgr Agata Nowak

No.	Crop	Share of local districts (gminas) at risk in Poland [%]	Share of arable area at risk of agricultural drought [%] in Poland
1.	Maize for grain	2231	90.07
2.	Maize for silage	2231	90.07
3.	Fruit shrubs	2149	86.76
4.	Legumes	2104	84.94
5.	Ground vegetables	1866	75.33
6	Tobacco	1834	74.04
7.	Spring cereals	1833	74.00
8.	Strawberries	1623	65.52
9.	Hops	1602	64.68
10.	Winter cereals	1601	64.63
11.	Potato	1580	63.79
12.	Fruit trees	1466	59.18
13.	Sugar beet	1067	43.08

No.	Crop	Share of arable area at risk of agricultural drought [%] in Poland
1.	Fruit shrubs	61.36
2.	Maize for grain	57.23
3.	Maize for silage	57.23
4.	Legumes	56.16
5.	Tobacco	48.70
6.	Ground vegetables	43.55
7.	Spring cereals	42.88
8.	Strawberries	35.32
9.	Hops	33.94
10.	Potato	33.47
11.	Winter cereals	32.63
12.	Fruit trees	28.00
13.	Sugar beet	15.82

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	95.19
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	95.31
3.	mazowieckie	314	314	100.00	74.46
4.	opolskie	71	71	100.00	53.44
5.	podlaskie	118	118	100.00	45.38
6.	świętokrzyskie	102	102	100.00	49.17
7.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	98.62
8.	zachodniopomorskie	113	113	100.00	73.48
9.	lubelskie	213	212	99.53	55.94
10.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	137	95.14	61.81
11.	dolnośląskie	169	153	90.53	40.18
12.	śląskie	167	147	88.02	56.48
13.	małopolskie	182	154	84.62	11.86
14.	podkarpackie	160	132	82.50	23.88
15.	pomorskie	123	57	46.34	22.74
16.	warmińsko-mazurskie	116	36	31.03	5.31

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	95.19
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	95.31
3.	mazowieckie	314	314	100.00	74.46
4.	opolskie	71	71	100.00	53.44
5.	podlaskie	118	118	100.00	45.38
6.	świętokrzyskie	102	102	100.00	49.17
7.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	98.62
8.	zachodniopomorskie	113	113	100.00	73.48
9.	lubelskie	213	212	99.53	55.94
10.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	137	95.14	61.81
11.	dolnośląskie	169	153	90.53	40.18
12.	śląskie	167	147	88.02	56.48
13.	małopolskie	182	154	84.62	11.86
14.	podkarpackie	160	132	82.50	23.88
15.	pomorskie	123	57	46.34	22.74
16.	warmińsko-mazurskie	116	36	31.03	5.31

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	99.25
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	97.39
3.	mazowieckie	314	314	100.00	80.21
4.	opolskie	71	71	100.00	68.53
5.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	99.82
6.	zachodniopomorskie	113	113	100.00	81.69
7.	świętokrzyskie	102	101	99.02	58.10
8.	lubelskie	213	210	98.59	64.22
9.	podlaskie	118	112	94.92	42.84
10.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	128	88.89	65.26
11.	dolnośląskie	169	147	86.98	51.35
12.	śląskie	167	138	82.63	62.62
13.	podkarpackie	160	127	79.38	24.98
14.	małopolskie	182	144	79.12	15.20
15.	pomorskie	123	46	37.40	21.95
16.	warmińsko-mazurskie	116	13	11.21	0.54

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	98.61
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	96.31
3.	opolskie	71	71	100.00	58.83
4.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	99.60
5.	zachodniopomorskie	113	113	100.00	68.78
6.	mazowieckie	314	313	99.68	73.49
7.	lubelskie	213	209	98.12	56.83
8.	świętokrzyskie	102	100	98.04	49.63
9.	podlaskie	118	104	88.14	32.20
10.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	125	86.81	59.73
11.	dolnośląskie	169	142	84.02	44.01
12.	śląskie	167	136	81.44	57.16
13.	podkarpackie	160	123	76.88	23.40
14.	małopolskie	182	138	75.82	11.79
15.	pomorskie	123	41	33.33	18.59
16.	warmińsko-mazurskie	116	4	3.45	0.05

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	93.53
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	83.34
3.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	96.86
4.	opolskie	71	70	98.59	41.65
5.	zachodniopomorskie	113	109	96.46	42.50
6.	lubelskie	213	202	94.84	41.14
7.	świętokrzyskie	102	90	88.24	34.35
8.	mazowieckie	314	271	86.31	52.20
9.	śląskie	167	131	78.44	45.35
10.	dolnośląskie	169	130	76.92	32.32
11.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	109	75.69	42.65
12.	małopolskie	182	109	59.89	7.74
13.	podkarpackie	160	88	55.00	18.36
14.	podlaskie	118	49	41.53	13.04
15.	pomorskie	123	23	18.70	8.74

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	98.65
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	94.08
3.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	99.26
4.	opolskie	71	69	97.18	58.99
5.	lubelskie	213	201	94.37	52.07
6.	zachodniopomorskie	113	105	92.92	47.67
7.	świętokrzyskie	102	88	86.27	38.23
8.	mazowieckie	314	269	85.67	55.88
9.	śląskie	167	131	78.44	53.29
10.	dolnośląskie	169	130	76.92	43.07
11.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	107	74.31	48.49
12.	małopolskie	182	102	56.04	8.88
13.	podkarpackie	160	83	51.88	19.78
14.	podlaskie	118	43	36.44	12.47
15.	pomorskie	123	21	17.07	8.95

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	94.15
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	84.55
3.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	97.45
4.	opolskie	71	69	97.18	44.98
5.	lubelskie	213	201	94.37	39.54
6.	zachodniopomorskie	113	105	92.92	37.63
7.	świętokrzyskie	102	88	86.27	33.12
8.	mazowieckie	314	269	85.67	50.52
9.	śląskie	167	131	78.44	45.32
10.	dolnośląskie	169	130	76.92	33.20
11.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	107	74.31	41.34
12.	małopolskie	182	101	55.49	7.08
13.	podkarpackie	160	83	51.88	17.35
14.	podlaskie	118	43	36.44	11.35
15.	pomorskie	123	21	17.07	7.93

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	87.58
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	78.70
3.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	92.55
4.	opolskie	71	67	94.37	32.26
5.	lubelskie	213	193	90.61	32.02
6.	mazowieckie	314	242	77.07	37.61
7.	śląskie	167	120	71.86	41.74
8.	świętokrzyskie	102	73	71.57	24.06
9.	dolnośląskie	169	118	69.82	27.69
10.	zachodniopomorskie	113	76	67.26	20.67
11.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	85	59.03	28.79
12.	małopolskie	182	70	38.46	4.80
13.	podkarpackie	160	61	38.12	12.46
14.	podlaskie	118	22	18.64	4.27
15.	pomorskie	123	11	8.94	3.18

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	84.06
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	77.43
3.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	90.35
4.	opolskie	71	67	94.37	31.99
5.	lubelskie	213	191	89.67	30.96
6.	mazowieckie	314	239	76.11	34.92
7.	śląskie	167	120	71.86	40.97
8.	świętokrzyskie	102	71	69.61	22.59
9.	dolnośląskie	169	117	69.23	26.61
10.	zachodniopomorskie	113	73	64.60	18.82
11.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	82	56.94	26.87
12.	małopolskie	182	68	37.36	4.42
13.	podkarpackie	160	58	36.25	11.47
14.	podlaskie	118	21	17.80	3.95
15.	pomorskie	123	10	8.13	2.57

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	81.79
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	76.43
3.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	89.02
4.	opolskie	71	67	94.37	31.72
5.	lubelskie	213	191	89.67	29.37
6.	mazowieckie	314	239	76.11	32.01
7.	śląskie	167	120	71.86	39.30
8.	świętokrzyskie	102	71	69.61	20.97
9.	dolnośląskie	169	117	69.23	25.56
10.	zachodniopomorskie	113	73	64.60	16.93
11.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	82	56.94	24.81
12.	małopolskie	182	67	36.81	4.07
13.	podkarpackie	160	58	36.25	10.88
14.	podlaskie	118	21	17.80	3.95
15.	pomorskie	123	10	8.13	2.09

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	87.04
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	77.96
3.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	92.15
4.	opolskie	71	67	94.37	31.81
5.	lubelskie	213	190	89.20	29.85
6.	mazowieckie	314	237	75.48	32.74
7.	śląskie	167	118	70.66	39.86
8.	dolnośląskie	169	116	68.64	26.96
9.	świętokrzyskie	102	70	68.63	20.96
10.	zachodniopomorskie	113	71	62.83	17.00
11.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	79	54.86	25.21
12.	podkarpackie	160	56	35.00	10.64
13.	małopolskie	182	60	32.97	3.98
14.	podlaskie	118	21	17.80	3.68
15.	pomorskie	123	10	8.13	2.06

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	lubuskie	82	82	100.00	77.78
2.	łódzkie	177	177	100.00	67.22
3.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	84.41
4.	opolskie	71	66	92.96	30.62
5.	lubelskie	213	174	81.69	21.56
6.	mazowieckie	314	223	71.02	24.44
7.	śląskie	167	112	67.07	31.70
8.	dolnośląskie	169	111	65.68	22.65
9.	świętokrzyskie	102	59	57.84	15.95
10.	zachodniopomorskie	113	53	46.90	11.03
11.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	65	45.14	20.85
12.	podkarpackie	160	44	27.50	7.01
13.	małopolskie	182	50	27.47	2.21
14.	podlaskie	118	17	14.41	2.52
15.	pomorskie	123	7	5.69	1.37

No.	Voivodeship	Number of local districts	Number of local districts at risk	Share of local districts at risk [%]	Share of the area at risk [%]
1.	wielkopolskie	226	226	100.00	56.29
2.	lubuskie	82	81	98.78	44.47
3.	łódzkie	177	173	97.74	34.73
4.	opolskie	71	62	87.32	21.14
5.	dolnośląskie	169	88	52.07	15.58
6.	śląskie	167	86	51.50	17.69
7.	lubelskie	213	107	50.23	11.45
8.	mazowieckie	314	126	40.13	9.43
9.	świętokrzyskie	102	33	32.35	2.57
10.	kujawsko-pomorskie	144	40	27.78	15.10
11.	zachodniopomorskie	113	21	18.58	5.54
12.	małopolskie	182	14	7.69	0.84
13.	podkarpackie	160	8	5.00	1.01
14.	pomorskie	123	2	1.63	0.13

Contact

Institute of Soil Science and Plants Cultivation
State Research Institute
ul. Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Puławy

Zakład Agrometeorologii i Zastosowań Informatyki
phone: 81 4786 879, 81 4786 752

Zakład Gleboznawstwa Erozji i Ochrony Gruntów
phone: 81 4786 779

W przypadku pytań dotyczących suszy proponujemy kontakt poprzez formularz zapytania, który należy wysłać mailem na adres susza@iung.pulawy.pl
Download the form

Opracowanie IUNG-PIB 2020 na zlecenie Misterstwa Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi

Comment from Agrometeorologist

CWB maps

Mapy zagrożenia suszą

Tabele dla gmin

Comment from Agrometeorologist

Communication report regarding the incidences of drought conditions in Poland